Reflection 2.1

In writing my rogerian argument, I had to use different techniques than in my rebuttal argument. I drastically changed my vocabulary. I wanted to sound more like I had a gentle understanding attitude towards the author’s argument. In my rebuttal argument I was able to argue my point without showing the author sympathy. Well it’s a little more challenging writing the rogerian argument because I have to think about where the author is coming from, find common ground, and make some compromises. I think I took on a pretty good point of view for this argument.
For this process I researched past court cases that were televised and the reactions that people shared about televised court cases. I found great articles through the library website and other historical cases. I would like to add some pathos to my argument, so I plan on maybe adding some personal stories from people that actually experienced having the court case televised if possible. I will also look for other types of evidence such as statistical and personal attributions to include in my next draft. I might also try to change up the format and structure of my paper in my second draft. My goals for my next draft included working on my works cited section, and adding more points to my argument. I want my audience to say that my argument is clear and it provides a lot of reasons. When I receive comments on my argument I will deeply take them into consideration, because I’m sure there are some other changes that I can make.